DACA Ruling Is Supreme Court’s Latest Act of Political Timidity

 
 
Jun 19, 2020
 

Happy Juneteenth from Washington, where we've got a historical look at the annual celebration from Jarrett Stepman. The Supreme Court makes no sense in ruling that President Trump can't end his predecessor's deportation shield for some illegal aliens, Hans von Spakovsky writes. On the podcast, we examine Trump's moves to combat racial injustice. Plus: the argument for keeping U.S. troops in Europe, and the high court's inaction on gun rights. On this date in 1865, Union soldiers arrive in Galveston, Texas, with news that the Civil War is over and slavery in America is abolished--more than two years after President Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation. Oh, boy: Tomorrow is the first day of summer, and Sunday is Father's Day.

 
 
 
Commentary
Photo
By Hans von Spakovsky

With the Supreme Court's latest erroneous decision on immigration, Chief Justice John Roberts and the court's four liberal justices have done lasting damage to the Constitution, the rule of law, and accountable government.
Commentary
Photo
By Jarrett Stepman

The Freedmen's Bureau, an agency created to transition freed slaves to lives as free men and women, began the first organized celebration of Juneteenth in Austin, Texas, in 1867.
Analysis
Photo
By Virginia Allen

Ashley D. Bell, White House policy adviser for entrepreneurship and innovation, explains how the president is taking steps to strengthen underserved communities economically and institute needed police and criminal justice reforms.
News
Photo
By Rachel del Guidice

"We reject the sweeping claim that all of law enforcement is racist. Rather, the majority of police officers—many of whom are black—are noble individuals protecting all the people in their communities," write the conservative signers.
Commentary
Photo
By Luke Coffey

America's economic and security interests require a stable Europe, and it is the U.S. military presence in Europe that helps to maintain European stability.
Analysis
Photo
By Virginia Allen

"This is a drastic change in the law that calls into question whether women are going to be protected as they have been. If men can be women under the law, then those protections really go away," says Kate Anderson of Alliance Defending Freedom.
Commentary
Photo
By Amy Swearer

Given that four of the "conservative" justices—Thomas, Kavanaugh, Alito, and Gorsuch—previously have signaled their desire that the court address important Second Amendment questions, the problem appears to lie with Chief Justice Roberts.
 
     
 
LOGO-CHARCOAL_75percent.jpg

The Daily Signal is brought to you by more than half a million members of The Heritage Foundation.

How are we doing?
We welcome your comments, suggestions, and story tips. Please reply to this email or send us a note at comments@dailysignal.com.

The Daily Signal
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
(800) 546-2843

 
 

Add morningbell@heritage.org to your address book to ensure that you receive emails from us.

You are subscribed to this newsletter as johnmhames1.diogenes--light@blogger.com. If you want to receive other Heritage Foundation newsletters, or opt out of this newsletter, please click here to update your subscription.

 
-

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FOLLOW THE MONEY - Billionaire tied to Epstein scandal funneled large donations to Ramaswamy & Democrats

Breaking: Left-Wing Black History Children’s Book Distributed by Simon & Schuster Is Heavily Plagiarized

Pence goes full swamp on Donald Trump.