Saturday, August 31, 2013

BREAKING: According to Rebels admit gas attack result of mishandling chemical weapons


BREAKING: According to Rebels admit gas attack result of mishandling chemical weapons

In a report that is sure to be considered blockbuster news, the rebels told Dale Gavlak, a reporter who has written for the Associated Press, NPR and BBC, they are responsible for the chemical attack last week.

Gavlak is a Middle Eastern journalist who filed the report about the rebels claiming responsibility on the Mint Press News website, which is affiliated with AP.

In that report allegedly the rebels told him the chemical attack was a result of mishandling chemical weapons.

This news should deflate the accusations, against the Assad regime, coming from the U.S., Britain, France and the Arab League.

Since the chemical attacks last week, the Assad government was immediately blamed. On Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry said: That Assad's guilt was "a judgment already clear to the world," according to

As a result of Assad's government being blamed for the chemical attacks, five U.S. warships are now stationed off Syria's coast. These destroyers are poised to deliver cruise missiles in a strike that is due to begin any time now. According to the report on Mint Press there have been several interviews conducted with people in Damascus and Ghouta, a suburb of the Syrian capital.

The interviews conducted of residents, rebels and their families in Damascus and Ghouta are painting a different picture of what actually happened. Many believe that rebels received chemical weapons provided through the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan. It's being reported that these weapons are responsible for last week's gas attack.

Read more:

BREAKING: According to Rebels admit gas attack result of mishandling chemical weapons

John Hames

Obama Hits Golf Course After Announcing National Emergency


Obama Hits Golf Course After Announcing National Emergency

by Mike Flynn 31 Aug 2013, 1:01 PM PDT post a comment

I'm not an expert in foreign policy, but I can think of a few things a President ought to do after requesting authority for a military strike on a sovereign nation. There are probably some Congressional leaders who ought to be briefed. There are likely one or two world leaders who would appreciate a chat about the US plans. No doubt generals in the military would have a thought or two about how things should proceed.

An hour after announcing a potential new military venture in the Middle East, with unknown consequences, "5 Wood or 2 Iron" is the last thing I want on a President's mind.

Obama Hits Golf Course After Announcing National Emergency

John Hames

Obama asks Congress to authorize Syrian strike


Obama asks Congress to authorize Syrian strike

President Barack Obama announced on Saturday that he has decided to strike the Syrian military in retaliation for its nerve gas attack on civilians — but that he'll wait for Congressional authorization before launching an attack.

"I'm ready to act in the face of this outrage," he said. "Today, I'm asking Congress to send a message to the rest of the world that we are ready to move together."

"I have the authority to carry out this military action…. [and] I know the country will be stronger if we take this course and our actions will be more effective" if it is approved by Congress, he said in a short statement delivered at the White House's Rose Garden.

Obama said congressional leaders have agreed to hold a debate after Congress returns from its August recess on September 9.

That's important for Obama, since he's facing opposition from the progressive left to any use of force — opposition that could damage Democratic turnout the 2014 mid-term election.

Obama acknowledged his allies' opposition, saying that the nation is opposed to military campaigns, and wants to end "a time of war that I was elected, in part, to end."

Obama also said he would use the next few weeks to build international support for action to enforce what he said is an global "norm" agains the use of chemical weapons.

"What is the purpose of the international system that we built without enforcement?" he said.

Without enforcement of a ban on chemical weapons, other threats — such as nuclear weapons, terrorism and genocide — may grow, he said. Top officials say the President is planning a limited strike to deter the Syrian government and other governments from using chemical weapons in the future. (RELATED: Obama and aides signal caution, delay on Syrian response)

The statement came as top administration officials continue briefing legislators about the Syrian government's Aug. 21 nerve gas on a rebel-held neighborhoods on the edge of Syria's capital city, Damascus.

Many Democratic legislators are backing action by the Democratic president, but many GOP leaders are keeping their distance, and have not urged a quick decision for or against a strike.

"If the president believes this information makes a military response imperative, it is his responsibility to explain to Congress and the American people the objectives, strategy, and legal basis for any potential action," said a Friday statement from the office of House Speaker John Boehner. "We — and the American people — look forward to more answers from the White House."

Some GOP legislators, including Sen. Mike Lee, and 120 House members, have signaled opposition to any strike.

Obama and his aides have said any operation would be limited, but have also left themselves room to delay action, pending approval from foreign governments.

The U.K. and Canadian governments have declined to participate in any strike. The French government may participate, and provide political support.

But any delays will could reduce the chance of a strike, because Obama is due to attend an international summit mid-September.

Also, the White House and Congress have scheduled several high-stakes, and time-consuming domestic battles for September and October, including fights over budgets, spending cuts, Obamacare and the federal government's debt limit.

The political battles will also be sharpened if Obama and his allies continue to push for a transformational bill that would double immigration during a period of high unemployment.

On Friday, Secretary of State John Kerry issued an emotional call for action.

"At least 1,429 Syrians were killed in this attack, including at least 426 children," Kerry said.

Kerry's statement was timed with the release of a report summarizing intelligence data that shows the Syrian army launched the chemical-tipped rockets at 12 sites in the Damascus suburbs on Aug. 21.

After the attack, reports showed "people twitching with spasms, coughs, rapid heartbeats, foaming at the mouth… unconscious and dead," Kerry said. "The question is not what we know, but what we do."

"It matters because a lot of other countries are watching… they want to see if the U.S. and our friends mean what we say….they're watching to see if Syria can get away with it," he said, citing Iran and North Korea.

The response "will directly effect our role in the world and our interests in the world," he said. "It is also about who we are — we are the United States of America, we are the country that has tried, not always successfully… to honor a set of universal values," he said.

Follow Neil on Twitter

Obama asks Congress to authorize Syrian strike

John Hames

Governor Sarah Palin Lays Out Her Powerful Case AGAINST Attacking Syria

Governor Sarah Palin Lays Out Her Powerful Case AGAINST Attacking Syria

"So we're bombing Syria because Syria is bombing Syria? And I'm the idiot?" – Sarah Palin

By Gary P Jackson

Governor Sarah Palin rips President Obama a new one regarding his plans to attack Syria. A disastrous plan, that has absolutely no support from other nations around the world, and little support here at home.

This isn't the first time Governor Palin has been critical of the Obama regime's foreign policy. In April of 2011 she warned Obama about getting involved in Libya, and again in October of that year, all of this before Obama and Hillary Clinton's bungling led to the slaughter of four brave Americans in Bengazi.

Governor Palin asks Obama if he hasn't learned that WAGs [wild ass guesses] don't work in war!

From Facebook: [emphasis mine]


"So we're bombing Syria because Syria is bombing Syria? And I'm the idiot?" – Sarah Palin

* President Obama wants America involved in Syria's civil war pitting the antagonistic Assad regime against equally antagonistic Al Qaeda affiliated rebels. But he's not quite sure which side is doing what, what the ultimate end game is, or even whose side we should be on. Haven't we learned? WAGs don't work in war.

* We didn't intervene when over 100,000 Syrians were tragically slaughtered by various means, but we'll now intervene to avenge the tragic deaths of over 1,000 Syrians killed by chemical weapons, though according to the White House we're not actually planning to take out the chemical weapons because doing so would require "too much of a commitment."

* President Obama wants to do what, exactly? Punish evil acts in the form of a telegraphed air strike on Syria to serve as a deterrent? If our invasion of Iraq wasn't enough of a deterrent to stop evil men from using chemical weapons on their own people, why do we think this will be?

* The world sympathizes with the plight of civilians tragically caught in the crossfire of this internal conflict. But President Obama's advertised war plan (which has given Assad enough of a heads-up that he's reportedly already placing human shields at targeted sites) isn't about protecting civilians, and it's not been explained how lobbing U.S. missiles at Syria will help Syrian civilians. Do we really think our actions help either side or stop them from hurting more civilians?

* We have no clear mission in Syria. There's no explanation of what vital American interests are at stake there today amidst yet another centuries-old internal struggle between violent radical Islamists and a murderous dictatorial regime, and we have no business getting involved anywhere without one. And where's the legal consent of the people's representatives? Our allies in Britain have already spoken. They just said no. The American people overwhelmingly agree, and the wisdom of the people must be heeded.

* Our Nobel Peace Prize winning President needs to seek Congressional approval before taking us to war. It's nonsense to argue that, "Well, Bush did it." Bull. President Bush received support from both Congress and a coalition of our allies for "his wars," ironically the same wars Obama says he vehemently opposed because of lack of proof of America's vital interests being at stake.

* Bottom line is that this is about President Obama saving political face because of his "red line" promise regarding chemical weapons.

* As I said before, if we are dangerously uncertain of the outcome and are led into war by a Commander-in-chief who can't recognize that this conflict is pitting Islamic extremists against an authoritarian regime with both sides shouting "Allah Akbar" at each other, then let Allah sort it out.

Just a little reminder for new readers: As Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin received regular high level national security briefings, and as Commander-in-Chief of Alaska's National Guard, the only Guard in the country that is permanently deployed, shared strategic command of the 49th Missile Battalion, America's first line of defense from nuclear attack.

A little something from RealClearPolitics' Donald Douglas circa 2008:

John McCain's selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as vice-presidential running mate is proving more shrewd by the hour. As Blackfive points out, Governor Palin, as Alaska's chief executive, has shared strategic command of the 49th Missile Defense Battalion of the Alaska National Guard:

One area of Sarah Palin's background that may help her is Alaska's unique role in our national security and homeland defense. Several folks have have mentioned this but Tom W. was specific and his info jibes with the record.

Alaska is the first line of defense in our missile interceptor defense system. The 49th Missile Defense Battalion of the Alaska National Guard is the unit that protects the entire nation from ballistic missile attacks. It's on permanent active duty, unlike other Guard units.

As governor of Alaska, Palin is briefed on highly classified military issues, homeland security, and counterterrorism. Her exposure to classified material may rival even Biden's.

She's also the commander in chief of the Alaska State Defense Force (ASDF), a federally recognized militia incorporated into Homeland Security's counterterrorism plans.

Palin is privy to military and intelligence secrets that are vital to the entire country's defense. Given Alaska's proximity to Russia, she may have security clearances we don't even know about.

According to the Washington Post, she first met with McCain in February, but nobody ever found out. This is a woman used to keeping secrets.

She can be entrusted with our national security, because she already is.

Governor Sarah Palin being saluted by sailors aboard the USS Bunker Hill (CG-52) a Ticonderoga class guided missile cruiser:

There's a reason why we trust Governor Palin on national security issues. She has a proven track record.

More of Governor Palin's experience as Commander-in-Chief here.

Like this:

Governor Sarah Palin Lays Out Her Powerful Case AGAINST Attacking Syria

John Hames

House GOP Leadership Statement On Syria


House GOP Leadership Statement On Syria

Posted on August 31, 2013

WASHINGTON, D.C. – House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and Conference Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) today issued the following joint statement:

"Under the Constitution, the responsibility to declare war lies with Congress. We are glad the president is seeking authorization for any military action in Syria in response to serious, substantive questions being raised. In consultation with the president, we expect the House to consider a measure the week of September 9th. This provides the president time to make his case to Congress and the American people."

House GOP Leadership Statement On Syria

John Hames

Obama uses phrase 'my military'; blood pressures rise!

Obama uses phrase 'my military'; blood pressures rise!

When it comes to an attack on Syria, President Obama gave the egotistical game away Friday when he referred to U.S. armed forces as "my military" during a White House news conference explaining the pending action.

"… I have had my military and our team look at a wide range of options," he said. "We have consulted with allies. We've consulted with Congress …" (Check out the video below)

Bad move.

A guy who ticked off half the country last year when he told Americans who own successful businesses "you didn't build that" looks pretty hollow claiming ownership over something the country inarguably built collectively.

And it didn't take long for Twitter to come alive:

Obamaphiles used to making excuses for His Eloquence will probably call it a slip of the tongue, but considering it was followed immediately by "our team," you get the impression Obama was saying exactly what he thought.

He probably does think the military as his own. And he's got some reasons:

He's got a lapdog secretary of defense in Chuck "I won't be in a policy-making position" Hagel. He's surrounded by generals who've spent five years coming up with rationalizations for liberal positions like why having gays openly serving in the military is great, why women should be in combat, and how every 18-every-man in uniform is a rapist-in-waiting.

But having reasons for thinking so is no excuse for blurting it out, particularly on the eve of attacking another country that poses no military threat to the United States whatsoever — and never has – in what is, at bottom, a fit of imperial pique. (And even emperors have the class to say "our.")

One thing Obama's going to learn, fast and hard, if he goes through with dragging this country into attacking Syria:

There really is no "I" in war.

Should U.S. strike Syria for (allegedly) using chemical weapons?

Obama uses phrase 'my military'; blood pressures rise!

John Hames

Fwd: Labor Day

Labor Day Congressman Phil Roe, Representing the First District of Tennessee
Having trouble reading this email? Click here to view in your browser.
Congressman Phil Roe, M.D. - Representing the 1st District of Tennessee

 Labor Day

On Monday we observe Labor Day. This federal holiday originated as a day to pay tribute to the contributions of the American worker and their achievements. Unfortunately, 7.4 percent of the population remains unemployed this Labor Day. In the state of Tennessee, things are even worse—in July, the unemployment rate was 8.5 percent, much higher than the national average.

Since 2009, the average duration of unemployment has almost doubled from 19.8 weeks to 35.6 weeks. But the president still advocates for economic policies that hurt, not help, the middle class—pushing for a top-down energy plan, doubling down on a health care reform law that will result in higher premiums, and implementing new regulations on construction and manufacturing employers. Since 2009, we have lost 742,000 construction jobs and 592,000 manufacturing jobs. Just last month, the president visited the great state of Tennessee to discuss his plan for the middle class. He mentioned energy, calling for jobs in wind, solar and natural gas and touting the "success in doubling America's use of wind, solar and geothermal energy." Unfortunately, he consistently fails to mention how we can make better use of our most abundant and utilized resources, like oil, natural gas and coal.

I've spent the month of August traveling around the First District to meet with job creators and I've hosted a series of town hall meetings. For many East Tennesseans, the recession isn't over. Hardworking families are still struggling to make ends meet and put food on the table. For these families, they're seeing their health care premiums increasing at unsustainable rates, the cost of food and gas continuing to rise and their taxes being increased.  House Republicans have made jobs and the economy our top priority and have set about to reverse these policies that are harming families.

When Congress returns to Washington in September, there is a lot of work to be done. We must decide how to fund government operations for the next year when the current continuing resolution expires on September 30th. And earlier this week, Treasury Secretary Lew notified Congress that the United States would hit the debt ceiling by mid-October, earlier than previously estimated. One thing is certain: we cannot continue to tax, borrow and spend our way to a better future. Out-of-control spending is one of the most significant threats to American prosperity. For too long, lawmakers from both parties have been irresponsible with your tax dollars, amassing a national debt of more than $16.7 trillion. This Congress, House Republicans have succeeded in cutting spending back to 2008 levels, but it's time to do more.

Over the last four years, the debt has increased by more than 50 percent. Our economic problems may not be solved overnight, but the answer to them is simple: we must cut spending, balance our budget and get Americans back to work.

As the month of August comes to a close, I'd like to personally thank each and every constituent that took time out of their busy schedules to come to one of my many town hall meetings, to call or email my office to express your views or allowed me visit your workplace or business. Tennesseans are truly incredible, hardworking people and I am so proud to call East Tennessee home.

Feel free to contact my office if we can be of assistance to you or your family. Our contact information can be found on our website,

E-News Sign-up
Forward to a Friend
Contact Phil

Facebook YouTube RSS Feed
Washington, DC Office
407 Cannon House Office Bldg
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-6356
Fax: (202) 225-5714
Kingsport Office
PO Box 1728
Kingsport, TN 37662
Phone: (423) 247-8161
Fax: (423) 247-0119
Morristown Office
1609 College Park Drive, Suite 4
Morristown, TN 37813
Phone: (423) 254-1400
Fax: (423) 254-1403

Articles: The Aftermath of the George Zimmerman Case, Part 1: The Trial, the Evidence and the Verdict

Articles: The Aftermath of the George Zimmerman Case, Part 1: The Trial, the Evidence and the Verdict

The aftermath of the verdict in the George Zimmerman case has been as depressing as the actions and atmosphere during the 17 months preceding the trial. The misuse of state power for political purposes and the deliberate misleading of the public by much of the media concerning the facts of the case pre-trial, has been matched in the aftermath by the threats by the US Department of Justice to retry the case in Federal Court and the refusal by many politicians and members of the press to explain the verdict as stemming from the evidence presented at trial. The collection of witness testimony, physical evidence and the forensic evaluation of the gunshot wound that clearly pointed towards Zimmerman's innocence. In coming to grips with the verdict's implications one must begin with an understanding of the actual evidence in the case. This is the first article in a three part series about the case. This article is devoted to a synopsis of the key evidence in the trial, highlighting the misconceptions that have been promulgated frequently in the media's reporting. In the second, the role of the media, the lawyers and the racial divide will be explored. The third article will reflect on how racial history impacts how people viewed the case.

Facts in the case

The map below is a useful aid in understanding the evidence in the case. Zimmerman's truck was located on the map at the cut through crossing Twin Trees and leading to the top of the T which leads to the east section of Retreat View Circle. It is the point from which he started walking along the cut through towards Retreat View. The phone call to the dispatcher begins with Zimmerman in the truck and continues as he follows the path. The distance from the "T" to Brandy Green's Townhouse is about 80 yards. That gives a perspective of the relative distances involved in the movements of Zimmerman and Martin. The X marks where Trayvon Martin was shot.

In understanding the confusion on the part of people discussing the case in the aftermath of the verdict it is important to clear up some misconceptions. These mistakes are the result of pre-trial misstatements of facts in the media and also follow from a failure to correct them in the media commentary that accompanied the reporting on the trial. TM house denotes Brandy Green's townhouse.


1. "The death of Trayvon Martin happened because George Zimmerman disobeyed a policeman's order to stay in his car and not follow Trayvon Martin."

The following facts are clear from the transcript of the call that George Zimmerman made reporting a suspicious person.

  • George Zimmerman was never told to stay in his car.
  • George Zimmerman was never told to return to his car.
  • George Zimmerman was not ordered to not follow Trayvon Martin. He was only told he did not need to do it, a suggestion made to protect the police department from future liability as well as common sense to protect the safety of George Zimmerman.
  • George Zimmerman answered the dispatcher's suggestion by saying ok and from the recording of the call it is clear that he stopped following him.
  • George Zimmerman told the dispatcher at 2:35 that "he ran" suggesting that he had lost sight of Martin and at 3:40 he expressed fear about saying his address out loud because he had lost sight of Martin. It would have been impossible for Zimmerman to have followed Martin if he did not know where he was.

2. "Trayvon would not have been killed if Zimmerman had not kept him from returning to the condo where he was staying with his father." (Henceforth we will refer to this place as Brandy Green's townhouse).

This is contradicted by the following

  • There were about 4 minutes between the point in time that Martin ran towards Brandy Green's townhouse and when he encountered Zimmerman at the intersection point at the top of the T where the fight apparently began. That meant that Martin had four minutes to walk or run about 100 yards to Brandy Green's townhouse, a distance he could have easily covered in less than 20 seconds.
  • According to the testimony of Rachel Jeantel, Trayvon Martin told her that he had returned to Brandy Green's townhouse and that he had lost sight of Zimmerman.
  • In further conversation with Martin, Jeantel testified that Martin saw Zimmerman again and confronted him verbally at that point in time which is about 7:15:55. From all witnesses, this encounter took place at the top of the T and not in front of Brandy Green's townhouse which is about 80 yards south of this point. For whatever reason, Martin chose not to go home. That was his decision and had nothing to do with Zimmerman impeding him.

3. "Trayvon Martin was racially profiled by George Zimmerman".

This is contradicted by the phone call to the dispatcher.

George Zimmerman: We've had some break-ins in my neighborhood and there's a real suspicious guy. It's Retreat View Circle. The best address I can give you is 111 Retreat View Circle. This guy looks like he's up to no good or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around looking about. [00:25] [7:11:59]

911 dispatcher: OK, is he White, Black, or Hispanic?

George Zimmerman: He looks black.

  • It appears at this point that Zimmerman is unsure that Martin is black. Thirty seconds later after Martin approaches Zimmerman's car and he has a closer look, he tells the dispatcher

George Zimmerman: Yeah, now he's coming toward me. He's got his hands in his waist band. And he's a black male.[1:03] [7:10:37]

In other words, he now confirms that Martin is black from which it can be inferred that he was initially unsure. Given the darkness and rainy conditions at the time, it is highly unlikely that Zimmerman could have identified Martin as Black when he first became suspicious of him. Furthermore, it is known from earlier recorded calls that Zimmerman, for purpose of identification, did not hesitate to mention the race of people he saw whether they were white or black. The likely reason he didn't initially volunteer the race of Martin was that he simply didn't know.

4. "George Zimmerman confronted Trayvon Martin".

No evidence of this was presented at the trial.

  • The location of the confrontation was at the intersection point of the T (an east-west cut through between two streets and a path leading south from this path). Zimmerman said he was walking towards his car which means he crossed this point heading west. From Rachel Jeantel's testimony it can be inferred that Trayvon was heading north to the intersection point from Brandy Green's townhouse. The most likely explanation was that they accidentally arrived at this point at about the same time. Given the row of town houses lining the T and the dark and rainy conditions, it is very unlikely that either had been aware of the other's proximity at the time they encountered each other. From the testimony of Rachel Jeantel and the information given by Zimmerman, it is likely that both were surprised by suddenly seeing the other.
  • From both the testimony of Rachel Jeantel and the information given to police by George Zimmerman, Trayvon initiated the ensuing exchange of words. There are various versions of what precisely was said and it is likely that neither Jeantel nor Zimmerman remembers the exact words, but it is clear that Martin was the first to speak.

5. "It is not clear who was calling for help".

In fact the evidence at the trial was overwhelming that it was Zimmerman calling for help.

  • The screams for help were heard for over forty seconds on the Jenna Lauer 911 call before the gunshot was heard. Since the call was made in response to the calls for help, there must have been a delay of at least 15-20 seconds before she first heard the screams and the 911 operator answered the phone indicating that the cries for help began almost immediately after Zimmerman encountered Martin.
  • Jonathan Good, went outside and saw Trayvon Martin on top of Zimmerman raining what appeared to be blows to Zimmerman's head and saw and heard the man on the bottom screaming for help.
  • Good told Martin to cut it out.
  • In response to Good's telling Martin to cut it out, Martin continued to rain down blows and Good told them he was going to call the police. The screams for help continued after Good went inside to make his 911 call.
  • Injuries to the back and side of Zimmerman's head as well as what appeared to be a broken nose in photos taken at the scene, as well as grass stains on the back of Zimmerman's jacket confirm that it was Zimmerman who was getting beaten up.
  • The only injuries that were found on Martin were the gunshot wound and abrasions to his knuckles.
  • The forensic examination of the gunshot wound indicates that in all probability Martin was shot while he was leaning over the prone Zimmerman.
  • The screams for help on the Zimmerman tape sound like they were all made by the same person.

What actually happened

It is impossible to know exactly what happened but there is enough witness testimony, digitally recorded information and forensic evidence to get a good general outline of events. Zimmerman, while driving to get groceries, noticed Martin wandering around in the rain and became suspicious. He pulled into the parking lot at the clubhouse on the north part of Retreat view circle and called the police department's non-emergency number to report a suspicious person. After being prompted for the racial or ethnic identity of the person he said "he looks black", though the hesitancy of his answer indicates that he wasn't sure. When Martin comes closer to his car, he reports to the police dispatcher that the suspicious person is black, reinforcing the likelihood that Zimmerman's suspicions were aroused by Martin's behavior rather than his race. From a comparison of the dispatcher call and Zimmerman's statements to police as well as what can be gleaned from Rachel Jeantel's testimony the following is what occurred. The phone call begins at 7:09:34. Martin passes by Zimmerman's car heading east along Retreat View Circle at 7:10:37. At 7:10:54 he comes back towards Zimmerman's car and from the call you can tell Zimmerman is now afraid.

George Zimmerman: Uh, huh. Something's wrong with him. Yep, he's coming to check me out. He's got something in his hands. I don't know what his deal is. [01:20][7:10:54]

The dispatcher replies with the following instructions:

911 dispatcher: Let me know if he does anything, OK? George Zimmerman: OK. 911 dispatcher: We've got him on the wire. Just let me know if this guy does anything else.George Zimmerman: OK.

This makes two times the dispatcher has asked for information that requires Zimmerman to observe Martin. Martin heads east again on Retreat view Circle, turning south onto Twin Trees. Zimmerman temporarily loses sight of Martin and pulls out of the clubhouse, turns east on Retreat View Circle and then south on Twin Trees and regains sight of Martin. At 7:11:42 Zimmerman reports Martin running away. Specifically, the transcript of the call reads

"George Zimmerman: He's running. [2:08] [7:11:42] 911 dispatcher: He's running? Which way is he running? George Zimmerman: Down toward the other entrance of the neighborhood. [2:14] [7:11:48] 911 dispatcher: OK, which entrance is that he's headed towards? George Zimmerman: The back entrance. [Zimmerman mutters Fucking Punks at [2:22] [7:11:56] 911 dispatcher: Are you following him? [2:24] [7:11:58] George Zimmerman: Yeah. [2:25] [7:11:59] 911 dispatcher: OK. We don't need you to do that. [2:26] [7:12:00] George Zimmerman: OK. [2:28] [7:12:02]

There is a sound of either labored breathing or wind rushing from about 7:11:52 until 7:12:02 which seems to mark the point at which Zimmerman gets out of his car and starts following Martin. This time interval of about ten seconds is the only point at which there is concrete evidence that Zimmerman is actually following Martin on foot and it is important to note that he embarks on the pursuit after the dispatcher asks Zimmerman "which way is he running?" This is the third request from the dispatcher indicating he wants Zimmerman to continue to observe Martin's actions and movements. Given the conversation with the dispatcher, it would seem that Martin's running away heightened Zimmerman's belief that Martin was a burglar. On the other hand, when Zimmerman started following him in his car, Martin probably thought that Zimmerman was acting suspiciously.

Insight into why Trayvon starts running away can be inferred from the testimony of Rachel Jeantel who is on the phone with Martin at this time. In her testimony at the trial she says that in response to Martin reporting he is being followed (in a car) by a "creepy assed cracker," she tells Martin that the guy following him is a rapist and tells him to run home. In her interview with Piers Morgan, she makes it very clear that she was warning Martin that the man he saw following him was probably a gay predator and that he needed to run home. Martin said he would walk quickly and, according to Jeantel's testimony, reported that he had reached Brandy Green's townhouse. He also says he is no longer being followed.

After Zimmerman says "ok" in response to the suggestion that he need not follow Martin, the discussion with the dispatcher continues:

911 dispatcher: Alright, sir, what is your name? [2:34] [7:12:08] George Zimmerman:George. He ran.

It is reasonable to assume the statement "He ran" means that Zimmerman has lost sight of Martin. The conversation continues for another minute in which they discuss where he should meet with the police. At about 3:40 the following dialogue takes place.

911 dispatcher: OK, what's your apartment number? George Zimmerman: It's a home. It's 1950 - oh, crap, I don't want to give it out - I don't know where this kid is [inaudible] [3:40] [7:13:14]

This part of the call confirms that Zimmerman no longer has sight of Trayvon. It also confirms that Zimmerman could no longer be following Martin because he doesn't know where he is; moreover, it also suggests that he is sufficiently afraid of Martin that he would be unlikely to confront him.

At this point a review of the map of Retreat View Circle is important. There is an east-west pathway (a cut through) between the streets Twin Trees and Retreat View Circle. About halfway along this path there is a pathway going south from the cut through that leads to the back of the Brandy Green's townhouse, the two paths in essence forming a T. The distance from where Martin is staying to the intersection point of the paths is about 80 yards. The north side of the cut through is lined with the backs of town houses as are both sides of the north-south path that leads to where Martin is staying, a fact that makes it difficult for a person walking along the top of the T to see someone on the stem of the T unless he is at the intersection point.

Zimmerman at this point has left his car and is walking towards Retreat View Circle to find a street address. As he walks back from Retreat Circle he crosses the intersection of the two paths and encounters Trayvon Martin who has left the back of Brandy Green's town house and has headed back to the intersection point of the T. It can be inferred from Rachel Jeantel's cell phone records that at approximately 7:15:50 Martin reports once again seeing Zimmerman. He initiates a verbal exchange with Zimmerman which becomes physical combat almost immediately. Who starts the fight is unknown. The only evidence for how it started is provided by Zimmerman who claims that he was sucker punched in the nose by Martin and stunned by the blow. The photographs of Zimmerman taken a few minutes after the confrontation confirm that his nose was smashed, knocked out of alignment and bleeding.

Since Martin died, how he ended up at the intersection of the paths remains a matter of speculation. But it appears that by an unfortunate twist of fate, the two arrived at the intersection at the same time and this sudden encounter led Martin to initiate an attack on Zimmerman. The testimony of Rachel Jeantel suggests that Martin may have been fearful that Zimmerman was going to sexually assault him. In her interview with Piers Morgan she seemed to be alluding to what is essentially "stranger danger", the term used by parents in warning their children to beware of people following them in automobiles.

Since Zimmerman is the only one who knows how the fight actually began, we cannot confirm Zimmerman's version of how it started. What we do know is that Martin quickly gained the upper hand and Zimmerman immediately began calling out for help. Several witnesses who heard the screams described them as someone screaming in fear for his life. Clearly, we know that it was Zimmerman calling for help since Jonathan Good went outside and saw Trayvon Martin on top straddling Zimmerman and raining blows towards Zimmerman's head. It would make no sense for the person who was delivering the beating to be crying out for help as if his life depended on it. So Martin from the beginning knew that Zimmerman wanted no part of the fight and that he was thoroughly beaten. Most telling is that when Jonathan Good yelled at him to cut it out, he ignored it and continued to beat Zimmerman who he held in a defenseless position. Of all the decisions that were made that night, the one that sealed his death was Martin's ignoring Good's demand to stop. At that point Zimmerman knew that nobody was going to help him and that Martin was not going to stop.

At the trial, the photos of the injuries to Zimmerman's head contrasted with the autopsy of Martin whose only observable injuries were the gunshot wound and some abrasions on one of his knuckles. Wet grass attached to the back of Zimmerman's jacket confirmed the eyewitness testimony of Jonathan Good that Zimmerman was the one lying on the ground. The testimony of forensics expert Vincent Di Maio, perhaps the world's leading expert on gunshot wounds, made it clear that the only reasonable explanation of the forensics around the gunshot wound was that Martin was leaning over a prone Zimmerman at the time Martin was shot.

While we can never be sure precisely what happened, the evidence suggests that Martin attacked Zimmerman by landing a blow to Zimmerman's nose, immediately gained the upper hand in the fight, and never received any blows in response until the gunshot wound that ended his life. Zimmerman clearly shot Martin in self-defense. The only question that was genuinely at issue in the trial was whether Zimmerman's fears at the time reasonably justified using a gun to defend himself.

Zimmerman did not testify at the trial but his narrative of events was presented in the form of police videos introduced by the prosecution. The police investigators testified that they felt Zimmerman was telling the truth and that the minor inconsistencies in his interviews were viewed as normal for witnesses trying to recall exact details of a past event. While the jury could have arrived at a not guilty verdict without Zimmerman's version of events, there was a good deal of evidence to support his credibility. From the beginning, Zimmerman waived his Miranda rights and voluntarily gave numerousstatements to police without the protection of legal counsel. A voice stress testadministered by the Sanford police showed that his answers to the questions,

"Did you confront the guy you shot? (No.)"


"Were you afraid for your life when you shot the guy? (Yes)",

were both consistent with his telling the truth. Zimmerman's account of the events was given before the police had collected evidence from potential witnesses and was not contradicted in any credible way by any of the subsequent witnesses. Perhaps most convincing of his credibility was his response of "Thank God" to the suggestion by Detective Serino that there was a video of the confrontation.

This was a tragic event. It is unlikely that Martin thought that Zimmerman was a neighborhood watch guy or some kind of security person. It is more likely that he suspected Zimmerman was a potential threat. Rachel Jeantel testified at the trial that Trayvon asked Zimmerman "what are you following me for?" and that Zimmerman responded "what are you doing around here?" I think this is unlikely because if this were the actual conversation, Trayvon would probably have said he was staying with his dad at Brandy Green's townhouse and that would have been the end of it. Far more likely is that Trayvon did not know what Zimmerman was up to and launched a pre-emptive attack. It is easy to fault both parties for irrational behavior but what makes this such a tragic event is that the actions of both were not irrational. After all, there had been numerous burglaries at Retreat Circle and Trayvon's movements legitimately aroused suspicions; and Martin had reason to be wary of Zimmerman since he had been following him in a car and Trayvon had no idea why. And the mutual suspicions of both Zimmerman and Martin were, if anything, enhanced by both Zimmerman's call to the dispatcher and Martin's phone conversation with Rachel Jeantel.

It is instructive to consider alternative scenarios in which events could have unfolded differently. Had Zimmerman not had a gun and had Trayvon continued to beat him, the police might have arrived soon enough to prevent Trayvon from inflicting great bodily harm to Zimmerman. Martin then would have been charged with aggravated assault. Martin's defense attorney would of course have argued that Martin acted in self-defense and assuming that Zimmerman's injuries did not get much worse, Martin would have been able to plea bargain to a lesser offense and gotten off with a couple of years of probation. On the other hand had Martin continued to pound Zimmerman, one of the blows to Zimmerman's head might have killed him in which case Martin would have been charged with second degree murder.

If the police had arrived on the scene a minute earlier and witnessed Martin on top of Zimmerman raining down blows and heard Zimmerman's cries for help, he certainly would have demanded that Martin stop. If he acceded to the demand, the police would have arrested him for assault. If he ignored the policeman's command he might have been shot.

With any of these alternative scenarios, it is clear that it would have been Martin facing criminal charges and the national press would never have covered the story.

Articles: The Aftermath of the George Zimmerman Case, Part 1: The Trial, the Evidence and the Verdict

John Hames