banner image

MARCO RUBIO DISCUSSES IRAQ, IMMIGRATION, AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION


MARCO RUBIO DISCUSSES IRAQ, IMMIGRATION, AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

Marco Rubio discusses immigration, iraq, 2016 presidential election.

Transcript

English (Automatic Captions)

0:00
be out we sat down with the senator yesterday
0:03
and we began with that special forces raid on ice
0:06
senator will be a welcome back to Fox News Sunday
0:10
back from me back as a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and
0:14
Senate Intel
0:16
what do you know about the Serie A rated and what do you think about well for
0:19
knowledge to say this a successful raid
0:21
and it's good news obviously that anytime you can to greater takeaway top
0:25
leadership and organization it's a positive step forward
0:27
it doesn't take away from the fact that ice is remains a group or just
0:31
in the last 48 hours captured yet another critical city within
0:34
iraqi continues to be a dangerous group that now find
0:38
for example very active no to operation in Libya that will have to confront here
0:42
fairly soon
0:43
I and a group that I think has designs on moving into lebanon perhaps sooner
0:47
than some others have anticipated so
0:49
there remains a risk but obviously we want to congratulate the men and women
0:52
in uniform and carried out and
0:54
and the president for for undertaken a mission you're running for president on
0:59
a platform of generational change
1:01
and in your announcement statement you said this
1:05
too many of our leaders and their ideas are stuck in the 20th century
1:08
senator what are your 21st century ideas
1:12
well couple for so we have to recognize that the balance of power in the world
1:15
has shifted
1:16
now you have a number of different challenges to our foreign policy you
1:20
have autocratic governments in russia and China
1:22
that are beginning to use their power to try to make their neighbor subservient
1:26
you have the riser
1:28
rogue states like North Korea and Iran two countries and either have or had
1:32
designs on weapons of mass destruction nuclear weapons that make him immune
1:35
from international pressure
1:37
but also increase in Bekasi Iran their global
1:40
other their control Middle East and then you have non-state actors
1:43
both transnational criminal groups and then groups like ice is an al Qaeda now
1:47
news for and others who pose a threat
1:49
not just in the middle east but to the homeland and these are all very
1:52
different threatened the required American foreign policy that that I can
1:56
reflect our that can address all of them
1:58
within the context that the belief that America needs to be the strongest
2:01
country in the world but
2:03
just generally on foreign policy you favor the same approach
2:07
as ronald reagan peace through strength on domestic policy
2:10
you favor spending cuts and tax reform in fewer regulations
2:14
not to say that any of that is wrong but it's not know you asked about foreign
2:18
policy in particular on
2:19
on for policy threats are different and we don't have the Soviet Union like
2:23
ronald reagan had we have multiple different threats all of them on their
2:26
own for example create the need for more cyber times your heart it's gaps
2:29
on the economic for your ideas now well first of all the ideas are new on the
2:33
global competitiveness from
2:34
we need to be and when ronald reagan cut taxes he did so because the top rate was
2:38
in the eighties nineties
2:39
today we need to cut rates to keep pace with global competition
2:43
on the on the other thing we talk a lot about is 21st century skills we haven't
2:47
outdated higher education system
2:49
that is not equipping that is leaving many americans behind it is not
2:53
equipping them with the 21st century they didn't
2:55
skills they need for 21st century jobs so we don't have enough vocational
2:59
training
2:59
we don't have enough flexibility in higher education for people that have to
3:03
work for time
3:04
to go back to school on acquired degree we graduate too many young people with
3:08
degrees
3:08
that do not lead to jobs and a mountain of student loan debt
3:12
so that's why I propose solutions to each one of these challenges perhaps the
3:16
biggest
3:17
issue that you're going to have to face in this campaign he is
3:20
immigration back in 2013 you were one of the authors of the comprehensive
3:25
immigration plan which included at tough water enforcement crack down on
3:29
employers but also a path
3:31
to citizenship here's what you said back then about the 11
3:35
million people in this country illegally those who once had no hoe
3:40
will give their kids the chance at a light they always wanted for themselves
3:43
here in america generations of unfulfilled dreams will finally come to
3:48
pass
3:49
but after it passed the Senate and ran into trouble
3:53
in the house you bailed on comprehensive immigration reform how come
3:58
well I didn't it's not that we bailed is that we don't have the votes to pass in
4:01
fact we have less votes for comprehensive immigration reform today
4:04
than we did two years ago when I passed because in the last election
4:08
because a unilateral actions the president took the executive order
4:12
because I'm a border crisis because matters so I still believe we need to do
4:15
immigration form
4:16
I still talk about on the campaign trail outlined in my book American Dreams
4:20
and the problem is we can do in one big piece of legislation the votes aren't
4:24
there
4:24
and the more time we did we follow that path the more time we're wasting
4:29
to address it but aren't leaders supposed to shape
4:32
public opinion rather than just follow it media
4:35
could shouldn't you have campaigned for this I remember when you came in to Fox
4:40
back in 2013 and you made a very articulate and compelling case for
4:44
comprehensive reform
4:45
right by not stand by and fight for them but the problem is the votes are there
4:48
in Houston fan as you know for example the majority leader in the house
4:52
partially lost his election on perception that he was in favor
4:55
immigration reform not
4:57
impacted the way others voted as well so clearly leader stand for the idea that
5:01
you need to do something but you also have to deal with the reality
5:03
that in the political process people are gonna vote based on what they're hearing
5:06
from their constituents and others
5:08
and that's what I'm basically saying is the votes are not there for
5:11
comprehensive immigration reform and at this stage
5:14
after two illegal executive orders after migratory crisis on the border with
5:18
minors last summer
5:20
the context in which we're having this debate is much different if we want to
5:23
move forward on immigration
5:24
the first thing we're gonna have to do is prove to the american people
5:28
that future illegal immigration is under control there is a narrative
5:32
about you that I want to give you the opportunity to address
5:35
going in a pro love 2013 back before
5:39
comprehensive immigration reform you were leading the republican field at
5:43
nineteen percent
5:44
but by October after comprehensive immigration reform passed the senate you
5:49
were in third place
5:50
at 12 percent critics say dead
5:53
you move to the right that you pushed a tough
5:56
new abortion law that you became much more of a hawk on foreign policy
6:01
to try to get
6:02
back in with the right well for small going and immigration I knew the history
6:05
of the issue
6:06
and certainly didn't go into it thinking it would help me politically in some
6:10
circles I knew that its controversy on
6:12
I know that controversy on now and terms are the other things you point to on
6:16
foreign policy
6:17
I don't know what those labels mean other than I've always advocated for a
6:20
strong american presence in the world on foreign policy I mean with act very
6:23
active before immigration in talking about the need not to engage in Libya
6:27
but to do so in a way that prevented what is happening now
6:31
from happening I consistently advocated before immigration that we needed to get
6:35
involved in fine
6:37
group on the ground in Syria that we can work with where would create a vacuum
6:40
that would be filled
6:41
by foreign fighters as happened with my sis to time and again I'm defendant for
6:46
Nate
6:46
on a tax that it somehow to waste the money it's less than
6:49
1 percent of our budget and it's an important on our soft power that's
6:53
always been true
6:53
the difference is that from 2013 to today
6:56
we've had an invasion ukraine and the annexation crimea
7:00
we had China building artificial islands in the middle of the South China Sea
7:05
and we've had the emergence of my sis and ices and the beheading and
7:08
Christians
7:08
and Americans these and and and we've had this nuclear negotiations with Iran
7:12
so the rhetoric it stronger a bit stronger it's because
7:16
the challenge is a brown more more urgent over the last couple years well
7:20
I want to talk about the rhetoric because you have gotten much
7:24
tougher at least in roderick are on foreign policy over the last few years
7:28
back in 2012
7:29
you supported President Obama's negotiation
7:32
other a nuclear deal with iran now
7:36
you say that if you're elected president that you might revoke
7:40
any delay make state take a look at this you very cautious when you say this
7:43
because I don't want to come across as some sorta
7:45
saber-rattling person cuz I'm not have you seen the movie taken
7:49
Liam Neeson he has a line and this is what our strategy should be
7:53
we will look for you we will find you
7:57
and we will kill you the
8:01
senator that's a pretty dramatic shift from no saber rattling to Liam Neeson
8:05
allow the saber-rattling thing was in response to a specific question I don't
8:08
recall what it was maybe we can play the whole video we will see
8:11
you have to say that I was in favor the Iranian negotiation who would not be in
8:14
favor of a deal that would be the deal
8:16
Iran would allow themselves to walk away from any sort of enrichment or
8:19
reprocessing
8:20
but that's not what the deal is we now know what the outlines of the deal are
8:24
and they're much worse than anybody anticipated and in fact every time
8:27
there's a new revelation about the only gets worse and worse and worse
8:31
and terms of our approach to terrorism absolutely because when you give these
8:35
radical group safe havens
8:36
whether it's in Syria and Iran are now iraq or libya the use those safe havens
8:41
the plan and carry out attacks against Americans and our allies
8:44
an increasingly here in the homeland as well this brings us back to our %ah
8:48
chemical
8:49
question of the week which is given what we know now would you have
8:53
invaded Iraq back and 2003 as we all know Jeb Bush had a tough time
8:58
answering that this week here's what you had to say was it a mistake to go to war
9:02
in Iraq
9:03
no I don't believe about the world is a better place because saddam hussein
9:05
doesn't run iraq
9:06
after finding out there were no weapons of mass destruction would you
9:10
if you knew that have been in favor all the iraqi invasion
9:14
well not only would I don't have been in favor of President Bush would not have
9:17
been in favor of it
9:17
and he said so senator isn't bad a flip
9:21
six weeks ago it made sense to invade Iraq in 2003 now you say it was a
9:26
mistake no two different questions
9:27
it was not a mistake the president based on this is the way the real world work
9:31
the president based on the information that was provided she was saying but I
9:34
based on the information Nunavut look that she wasn't based on the end what we
9:38
know now
9:38
well have based on what we know now I think based on what we know now I
9:41
wouldn't be no
9:43
thought Manny PAC allies gonna beat in that a land and that fighting I know
9:46
what you're going down the same question and you said
9:49
you know what I think now is not the same question the question was whether
9:52
as a mistake and my answer is it's not a mistake I still say was not a mistake
9:56
because the president was presented with intelligence is that Iraq had weapons of
9:59
mass destruction
10:00
it was governed by a man who had committed atrocities in the past two
10:03
weapons minutes the secretary after was
10:05
was it a mistake to go to war with Iraq it was not a mistake given the fact that
10:09
the president knew at the time she didn't say that she does well as items
10:13
that are not
10:13
same question the question I was asked is what you know now while based on what
10:17
we know now I think everyone agree was at least a
10:19
was it a mistake to go to war with Iraq a good student was now I'm asking you to
10:23
yeah I understand but that's not the same question but I'm asked that
10:25
question I'm asking you
10:27
posit a mistake that was not a mistake for the president to decide to go into
10:30
Iraq because at the time he wants to ask you that
10:32
I'm asking you in hindsight yeah the world is a better place because saddam
10:35
hussein is not there so I went back rather
10:38
but I don't understand the question you ask I'm asking you president knowing
10:41
every day as we secure in 20
10:43
but that night when president stop it a president cannot make a decision I had
10:46
something right now in the much that's what I'm asking you
10:48
was it on the stack it was not a mistake for the president to go into Iraq based
10:53
on the information he was provided as president
10:55
today we know there we had the president had known that there were no weapons of
10:59
mass destruction at the time
11:00
you still had to deal with saddam hussein but the process would have been
11:04
different
11:04
I doubt very seriously the president would have gotten for example
11:07
congressional approval
11:08
to move forward with an invasion had they known there were no weapons of mass
11:12
destruction
11:12
that does not mean he made the wrong decision because at the time he was
11:16
presented with my time China stand out said there are weapons of mass
11:19
destruction
11:19
he was in dealing with the Nobel Peace Prize winner he was done with saddam
11:23
hussein
11:23
and he made the right decision based on the information he had at that time
11:27
we learn subsequently that that information's wrong
11:30
and Mike my answer was well about the time it would have been
11:34
apparent that the intelligence was wrong I don't think george bush would move
11:38
forward on the invasion he certainly wouldn't have congressional approval
11:41
but presidents don't have the benefit of hindsight you have to make difficult
11:44
decisions
11:45
based on the information that's report before you at that moment when we come
11:49
back more of our exclusive interview
11:51
what 2016 senator you said recently that hillary clinton shouldn't be elected
11:56
president because we can't afford
11:58
another eight years of soap opera Williams
12:02
well again unfortunately both under her husband's presidency her time in the
12:07
Department of State
12:08
her campaign for the president the last time and even now
12:11
now there seems to be this cloud of constant scandal and things that
12:15
distract us from the core issues at the moment
12:17
and I just think at this hinge moment in our history
12:21
where we are asked to make a transition from the past into this new future
12:24
with all the challenges and the opportunities a part-time we really
12:29
the American people are not at a point now where I think they're going to be
12:31
supportive more drama
12:33
surrounding the political process you call clinton
12:36
a candidate from yesterday is that another way of saying she's too old
12:40
not another way of saying she's a defender of the status quo at a time
12:43
when we're in desperate need of transformational policies
12:46
I mean at the end of the day which is promising to do to the extent we know
12:50
because she's not talking to the media is to continue much of the president's
12:54
policies now we don't know where she stands on train
12:56
we don't know how she justifies for example not supporting the surge
13:00
in Iraq and the sorts of other things but we know that she supports much for
13:04
the president's agenda
13:05
and this is not a time for status quo we need reforms that will make us more
13:09
globally competitive
13:10
that will equip our people the 21st century skills and that will strengthen
13:14
America's role in the world and assume the mantle global leadership in
13:17
one up the knocks on you she's the candidate from yesterday
13:20
is that your to ya people still talk about you taking that's where the water
13:25
during the State of the Union response 43-year-old first term senators may not
13:30
be quite as appealing as president as they were before 2000 8
13:34
how do you answer those who say we need somebody with work experience maybe
13:38
governor whose run things cloth certainly mean governors an important
13:42
job to and
13:43
their quality governors that could serve our country present have done so in the
13:46
past we've had bad governors to jimmy carter was a governor
13:49
but let me just say that ultimately for free but understand what I've done
13:52
before I even came to the senate I mean I was the
13:55
member the Florida Legislature for nine years speaker the house majority leader
13:59
majority web I've been in the senate now for four and a half years and played a
14:03
pretty vibrant role in both
14:04
foreign policy on Foreign Relations Committee and also on the intelligence
14:08
committee
14:08
and have a record making judgments on public policy
14:12
and in particular on foreign policy that people could look at ultimately
14:15
what's most important the presidency is the judgment that you have in terms of
14:19
the future of our country
14:20
and on foreign policy in particular and I would add one more point
14:24
the selection will be about the future not about the past and it is important
14:27
that we have a president that
14:28
understand both the challenges and the opportunities that our country faces not
14:32
just today
14:32
but will face tomorrow's long in the exit polls on election night 2012 1
14:38
numbers stood I'll to me 21 percent of voters said that cares about people like
14:43
me
14:44
was the most important Canada quality eighty-one percent voted for Obama
14:49
18 percent voted for Romney senator how do you persuade poorer and middle-income
14:55
people that your plans
14:58
will be better for them than hillary Clinton what a great question
15:01
first of all we have to talk about the plight folks are facing and I do that's
15:05
why I wrote American dream
15:06
that's what my policies have been built on I talk about the single mother was a
15:09
receptionist at eleven dollars an hour
15:12
and why we need to make higher education flexible so she can go to school at
15:15
night or on weekends
15:17
and become a paralegal and triple her pay I talk about people trapped in
15:21
poverty
15:21
because I anti-poverty programs deal with sometimes the poverty
15:25
but do not help to cure it I talk about the plight about
15:28
young couple trying to start a business out the spare bedroom at their home but
15:32
they can't
15:32
because the regulations because I've access to capital due to dodd-frank
15:36
it's important to talk about people that are going through this and then connect
15:40
at
15:40
and their plight to our specific public policies and it's gonna be
15:44
it's gonna take some work because I think it goes unfortunately
15:47
against the years and years and years that narrative that the republican party
15:50
is the party above wealthy in which people at the expense of everybody and
15:54
they're going to have social programs and they want to keep Obamacare
15:57
and
15:57
in what ultimately I think nest most people rather have a good paying job
16:01
that allows them to
16:02
own home you send their kids to college and retire with dignity
16:06
and we need to prove consistently over a period of time why our policies lead to
16:10
that
16:11
faster and better more consistently than the big government policies and left
16:15
I think it's fair to say that Jeb Bush
16:18
was your political mentor in Florida politics
16:21
here he is on your election night in 2010
16:26
my wife has told me don't don't cry don't cry
16:32
but Marco Rubio makes me cry for joy when you see that
16:37
any mixed feelings about now running against jeb Bush for president
16:41
I'm not running against jeb bush nor is jeb bush running against Marco Rubio
16:44
I remain his friend and admire I think usery
16:47
did a great job as governor for i think is gonna be a very good candidate
16:51
ultimately I just honestly believe that the nation is that hinge moment
16:55
in its history where needs to decide what kind of country is going to be in
16:58
the 21st century
16:59
it faces unique challenges but also an extraordinary opportunity to have
17:03
another American Century
17:05
and I believe I'm contributing to this debate ideas
17:08
and %uh view that no one else in the race is at least at this time
17:11
and that's what we're going to write I'm enid obviously people you may not be
17:14
running against each other people gonna have to compare you
17:16
why are you the person for the 21st century and not your political or
17:20
I would love it if the entire party adopted our view the future but that's
17:23
what we're gonna have a debate over and I think we're capable as republicans
17:26
with a very talented field amend quality individuals
17:30
to have a debate about the best way forward with our country without
17:33
necessarily disliking each other
17:35
I think we're blessed as a Republican Party to have eight nine ten quality
17:38
camera with the democrats are struggling to come up with one
17:41
you talked earlier about the clinton soap opera last sunday in the new york
17:46
times they have an investigation
17:48
a fun page investigation a view it said that Florida billionaire Norman Braman
17:53
has financed do both
17:55
personally and politically and
17:58
as a Florida legislator you scared five million dollars to a Cancer Center
18:02
name for the Bremen family over the objections love
18:05
then Governor Jeb Bush were you
18:08
paying back a friend a supporter your first thought was an investigation
18:12
virtually everything in that article was the
18:14
things that we wrote about years ago or provided to them a mister Bremen
18:17
provided to them
18:18
second I'm problem I sociation mister Bremen in fact the things you outline or
18:22
charities A Breast Cancer Center
18:24
and genomics research project at the University Miami supported not just by
18:27
mister Bremen bud on a shillelagh
18:29
who is the president at the University Miami Adam and Innovation Fund
18:33
created specifically for purposes but rhyme attracting by technical resent the
18:37
fact that he had given a lot of money to you politically out a lot like you re my
18:41
wife had a given a lot of money too
18:42
those programs as far as a lotta money to us personally I was a lawyer
18:45
and mister bremen was one of my clients at some point and my wife does a
18:49
fantastic job helping his family decide
18:51
who donate in some instances millions of dollars to charities in our community
18:56
he has never asked for a political favor he's never asked for any
18:59
issue that involves as business mister Bremen's interest is a pillar the South
19:03
Florida community and whatever leading philanthropists and I'm problem I
19:05
sociation with bringing family you had to file a financial disclosure form on
19:11
Friday and
19:11
in that you noted disclose the fact that you have cashed out all
19:17
love your retirement accounts that's not accurate now I have other retirement
19:21
account that just one retirement account from an ABA that I had years ago the
19:25
American Bar Association why work with an old law firm
19:27
years ago it's not its I still have my the TSP account that I
19:32
contribute to every week in my paycheck here at the federal level I have a
19:35
back every time an account from my years the service in the florida legislature
19:39
was just one specific count
19:40
that we wanted to have access to cash a in the coming year
19:44
both cuz I'm running for president but also you know my refrigerator broke down
19:47
I was three thousand dollars I had to replace the air conditioning unit in our
19:50
home
19:51
my kids are go to school or getting closer to college in school getting more
19:54
expensive
19:55
and then when you're running for president we just wanted access to some
19:58
other cash but we have other retirement savings in
20:00
and we've been blessed with out with a book that's done fairly well to button
20:03
i'm not i'm not i'm not poor but I'm not rich either finally
20:07
and its I wanna go back to the block you say in the book
20:11
American Dreams that you know the American dream because you have lived
20:15
the American dream your mom and dad
20:17
came from cuba in the fifties your dad was a bartender your mom worked
20:21
as as a cashier clerk Anna and as a
20:25
as a made what was life like growing up
20:28
in that family and what were the values
20:32
that you got there that that would serve as a guide to you as president
20:35
my parents were workers me my mom especially my high school years was a
20:39
stock clerk at Kmart
20:40
time to mount a point when she worked the night shift overnight my dad was a
20:44
bartender at work banquets laminne holidays weekends nights
20:47
and they were never richer famous me know
20:50
but but they were successful with a work because the purpose in their life was to
20:53
give us the chance to do all the things they never could
20:56
and so growing up I think they instilled in us disbelief I know they instilled in
20:59
us this belief that it didn't matter that he was a bartender and that she was
21:02
a maid
21:03
I can be anything I wanted because I was an American and I'll and I hope that
21:07
that's really what's propelled me in the public service
21:09
I want us to continue to be that kind of country for ever
21:13
but certainly in the 21st century not the kinda country I want my kids to
21:16
inherit
21:16
you in the book talk about when you were 13 years old
21:21
your grandfather fell and you were
21:24
in the ambulance with him and that you made him a promise
21:28
yet why choose when he was passing away already at the hospital
21:32
all my life the atomic study been partially because I think you always
21:36
wished you had a college degree or the equivalent thereof something I really
21:39
value
21:40
because coming from where they didn't having an education was something that
21:43
was reserved for the wealthy
21:45
but what he really meant was not just study we met was
21:48
be you do that maximize the opportunities you're going to have
21:52
you're going to have a chance to do things I never had a chance to do don't
21:55
blow it
21:55
and I wanted him to know that I want to what you say i said i wud nice and I'm
21:59
gonna study a promising
22:00
them and I what I meant by that was is I'm gonna make sure that
22:04
the chances that I have that you didn't have whatever it is in life I try to do
22:08
I'm gonna maximize it because I have I want to make sure that you know that
22:11
your sacrifices
22:13
and your hard work was not in vain center will be always back to talk with
22:17
you
22:17
thank yousee travels on the campaign trail thank you

Check out this episode!

MARCO RUBIO DISCUSSES IRAQ, IMMIGRATION, AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MARCO RUBIO DISCUSSES IRAQ, IMMIGRATION, AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION Reviewed by Diogenes on May 18, 2015 Rating: 5

No comments:

Breaking News: Man who stomped alleged Bondi terrorist regrets not hurting him more

  ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌ ...

Powered by Blogger.